A Look at Mainstream Media’s Bias and Lack of Accountability
For decades, Americans have trusted the mainstream media as their primary source of information. However, public confidence in journalism is at an all-time low. According to Gallup, fewer than one in three Americans say they trust the media to report the news fully, accurately, and fairly. That skepticism didn’t appear out of thin air—it’s the product of repeated failures, misleading narratives, and outright falsehoods delivered by outlets that once billed themselves as guardians of truth.
This article takes a hard look at some of the biggest examples of either total incompetence and lack of accountability in mainstream media or outright lying to the American people—and why it matters.
1. Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq
Perhaps the most infamous example: in the lead-up to the 2003 Iraq War, major outlets like The New York Times and CNN ran with claims that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. Those claims turned out to be false. Yet the stories helped sway public opinion and justified a war that cost thousands of lives and trillions of dollars. Few journalists responsible for those errors faced any accountability.
2. The Russia Collusion Narrative
For years, mainstream networks devoted endless coverage to claims that Donald Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election. Despite no basis and fabricated evidence, media companies pushed a narrative that shaped national politics for years—without retractions proportional to their original coverage.
3. COVID-19 Origins and Lab-Leak Dismissal
Early in the pandemic, any suggestion that COVID-19 may have originated in a Wuhan lab was branded a “conspiracy theory” by much of the press. Only later, after government agencies themselves began seriously considering the lab-leak hypothesis, did coverage shift. The premature dismissal revealed how quickly media aligned with political narratives rather than pursuing open inquiry.
4. The Hunter Biden Laptop Story
Just weeks before the 2020 election, major outlets and social media platforms dismissed and suppressed reporting on Hunter Biden’s laptop as “Russian disinformation.” Later, those same outlets quietly admitted the laptop was authentic. The damage, however, had already been done in shaping voters’ perceptions.
5. Selective Coverage of Protests and Riots
During 2020, many networks minimized or downplayed violent riots, often using language like “mostly peaceful protests” even while footage showed burning buildings in the background. The choice of words was not accidental—it revealed how media outlets framed stories to match preferred narratives rather than the realities on the ground.